I do not work with video so no help on Final Cut Pro. Photoshop seems faster for many things but I have not done "heavy" editing with it on the M2Pro yet. Overall system (Mac OS) speed (Finder) is not much different. Other tasks, like working in LR "Library" are probably a bit faster but not (so far) by that much. I set up this new computer as a new machine (i.e did not "port over" applications and settings from a previous Mac) so I also had to spend a bit of time resetting all the Apple defaults I am not fond of. Also seemingly randomly, Apple would install the AirPrint version of the Epson driver without giving a choice - just had to uninstall and reinstall until the correct one was in place. "System Preferences" are now "System Settings" and are organized more like on an iPad/iPhone.) The print dialog box is quite different and took a while to get set up (had been fine with Monterey) the biggest issue being that settings would not "stick" once set (workaround so far was to save settings as a "custom" preset setting (not a job preset setting which acted as the default choice). Had Monterey working well but there is a bit of a learning curve to Ventura (i.e. Less happy with having to use Ventura as the OS. I suspect there can be differences in processing times based on the image/raw file content but so far pretty happy with the improvement. In the few times I have had a chance to use it on the M2Pro the times were in seconds for DeepPrimeXD. When using it on the 2018 Mini would get conversions in the minutes range, times like 14 minutes would pop up on the screen but It may have been a bit less actual time. Also just started to use PureRaw DeepPrimeXD. Just setting up a M2Pro Mini (12‑core CPU, 19-core GPU, 32 GB RAM). What is your experience with performance? I know that FCP put all stuff on the temporary space of the internal disk if RAM is not enough. That would mean if you have opened some of Adobe Apps with fix assigned RAM then there is only the rest of RAM for other apps. I know, that for Adobe you can assign an amount of RAM, but obviously not for PureRaw. I will get it in two weeks and can make some tests. If you want to know more about Mini M2 Pro performance then let me know. If somebody is using FCP (Final Cut Pro) then please, write about your setup and performance. I find on my Macbook M1 Pro it is now 18. If somebody is using M2 please, write what application you are using and if performance increased. DxO Forums 100 slower latest version DxO PhotoLab macOS topics TimMunsey (TimMunsey) June 7, 2022, 12:42pm 1. It would be interesting to know about your setups and their performance. I decided for Mini because Studio is very expensive and big and sometimes I need to take it with me to other locations. The question is if anybody is using a Mini with similar configuration? : Apple M2 Pro with 10‑Core CPU, 16‑Core GPU, 16‑Core Neural Engine, 32 GB RAM. Ok, that was aactually not a question but facts. I let it on the auto, and that perhaps was a problem. There is an option in settings of DXO to use CPUs, a graphic processor or to choose it automatically. So, the PureRawXD increased the time dramatically on my Macs. When I used just DeepPrime of PureRaw 2 it took about 5-6min pro file on my Macs. On Huawei i7, 16GB Windows computer (ProBook from 2021) of my friend it took 4min (the same file, of course) On MacMini it takes about 30min for a file (I let running many files during the night and calculated the duration) I used the new PureRaw DeepPrime XD and it took 45min on MacAir to process a one Z9 (45MP) file with ISO 18000 with all optical corrections to DNG-file. MacAir has i5 and 16GB RAM, MacMini - i7 with 16GB RAM, pretty the same but Mini is a bit faster. Finding the sweet spot is to balance the trio (CPU, GPU, transfer) in a way to provide optimal load distribution and hence shortest processing time.I am using PureRaw a long time and recently installed PureRaw 3 on my MacAir notebook (from 2018) and MacMini (from 2014). Sometimes, 3 or 5 would provide shorter export times, that’s why I leave settings at 4 - out of 12 (on iMac)īackground: Processing is limited by a) the CPU, b) the GPU and c) how fast bits can travel between CPU and GPU. On my 8-core iMac, the best setting is 4. To find the sweet spot with your computer and usual customising, change the number of parallel export processes as shown above and see how times vary vs. You can’t get more than 100% of what is available, so getting 100% is the best you’ll get, which is a good thing, because it provides the shortest overall export times.ĭepending on your customising and GPU capabilities, export load is also handled by the GPU, which can shorten (or lengthen) processing times. If CPU load is at 100%, this simply means that your CPU does all it can do, it wastes no cycles and puts everything into processing your images.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |